<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olympus 850 SW DigiCam is Pretty But Rugged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chipchick.com/2008/03/olympus_850_sw_is_pretty_on_the_outside_but_rugged_on_the_inside.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chipchick.com/2008/03/olympus_850_sw_is_pretty_on_the_outside_but_rugged_on_the_inside.html</link>
	<description>Tech &#38; Gadgets from a Girl&#039;s Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:09:53 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rin</title>
		<link>http://www.chipchick.com/2008/03/olympus_850_sw_is_pretty_on_the_outside_but_rugged_on_the_inside.html/comment-page-1#comment-287224</link>
		<dc:creator>Rin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 08:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipchick.com/2008/03/olympus_850_sw_is_pretty_on_the_outside_but_rugged_on_the_inside.html#comment-287224</guid>
		<description>I got, what i believe to be, the first version of this camera. 
it works perfectly! the pictures underwater are beautiful, the flash even works!
some reviews said that the picture dont come out right but when you have it on the right setting (especially for underwater) the pictures come out a lot clearer and better.
i say that it is a GREAT buy. worth the money!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got, what i believe to be, the first version of this camera.<br />
it works perfectly! the pictures underwater are beautiful, the flash even works!<br />
some reviews said that the picture dont come out right but when you have it on the right setting (especially for underwater) the pictures come out a lot clearer and better.<br />
i say that it is a GREAT buy. worth the money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shockproof Olympus 850 SW &#124; Gizmograph</title>
		<link>http://www.chipchick.com/2008/03/olympus_850_sw_is_pretty_on_the_outside_but_rugged_on_the_inside.html/comment-page-1#comment-285527</link>
		<dc:creator>Shockproof Olympus 850 SW &#124; Gizmograph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 05:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chipchick.com/2008/03/olympus_850_sw_is_pretty_on_the_outside_but_rugged_on_the_inside.html#comment-285527</guid>
		<description>[...] ChipChick &#124; Read   Tags: 850 SW, Olympus, Olympus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ChipChick | Read   Tags: 850 SW, Olympus, Olympus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
