<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GE DECT 6.0 PhotoPhone Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chipchick.com/2008/10/ge_dect_60_photophone_review.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chipchick.com/2008/10/ge_dect_60_photophone_review.html</link>
	<description>Tech &#38; Gadgets from a Girl&#039;s Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:00:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Oregon Scientific Photo-Touch Phone with 7&#8243; LCD Display &#124; Chip Chick</title>
		<link>http://www.chipchick.com/2008/10/ge_dect_60_photophone_review.html/comment-page-1#comment-374737</link>
		<dc:creator>Oregon Scientific Photo-Touch Phone with 7&#8243; LCD Display &#124; Chip Chick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipchick.com/?p=6604#comment-374737</guid>
		<description>[...] Photo-Touch Phone from Oregon Scientific may just do what the GE DECT 6.0 PhotoPhone couldn&#8217;t. It&#8217;s stylish, sleek, and modern with a 7&#8243; LCD display. Offering DECT [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Photo-Touch Phone from Oregon Scientific may just do what the GE DECT 6.0 PhotoPhone couldn&#8217;t. It&#8217;s stylish, sleek, and modern with a 7&#8243; LCD display. Offering DECT [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rickey</title>
		<link>http://www.chipchick.com/2008/10/ge_dect_60_photophone_review.html/comment-page-1#comment-374140</link>
		<dc:creator>Rickey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipchick.com/?p=6604#comment-374140</guid>
		<description>My wife received the GE DECT 6.0 Photophone as a Christmas gift. The picture display went out within 2 months. The company said that a replacement was not available. They offered a cash refund of about half the original cost because we did not have a receipt. The one year warranty or the photophone is not worth much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife received the GE DECT 6.0 Photophone as a Christmas gift. The picture display went out within 2 months. The company said that a replacement was not available. They offered a cash refund of about half the original cost because we did not have a receipt. The one year warranty or the photophone is not worth much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Bailey</title>
		<link>http://www.chipchick.com/2008/10/ge_dect_60_photophone_review.html/comment-page-1#comment-373875</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipchick.com/?p=6604#comment-373875</guid>
		<description>Bought one for my wife as a gift.  You are right that the handset is cheap.  Very poor voice quality.  But we kept it because we like the photo caller id.  But even that part lasted less than a year.  Now it&#039;s dead after on 10 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought one for my wife as a gift.  You are right that the handset is cheap.  Very poor voice quality.  But we kept it because we like the photo caller id.  But even that part lasted less than a year.  Now it&#8217;s dead after on 10 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
