<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seagate Replica Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chipchick.com/2009/04/seagate_replica_review.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chipchick.com/2009/04/seagate_replica_review.html</link>
	<description>Tech &#38; Gadgets from a Girl&#039;s Perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:22:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seagate &#187; Chip Chick: Seagate Replica Review</title>
		<link>http://www.chipchick.com/2009/04/seagate_replica_review.html/comment-page-1#comment-377144</link>
		<dc:creator>Seagate &#187; Chip Chick: Seagate Replica Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipchick.com/?p=8229#comment-377144</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the full article   This entry was written by Seagate Technology, posted on April 27, 2009 at 2:23 pm, filed under Company, Digital Home, Media Coverage, Products, Seagate, Technology and tagged chip chick, hdd, replica, review, Seagate. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the full article   This entry was written by Seagate Technology, posted on April 27, 2009 at 2:23 pm, filed under Company, Digital Home, Media Coverage, Products, Seagate, Technology and tagged chip chick, hdd, replica, review, Seagate. Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Carney</title>
		<link>http://www.chipchick.com/2009/04/seagate_replica_review.html/comment-page-1#comment-374215</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Carney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 16:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipchick.com/?p=8229#comment-374215</guid>
		<description>&quot;In a lot of ways, the Seagate Replica is like a PC version of Apple’s Time Machine.&quot;

Not only is it in a  lot of ways like Time Machine, it&#039;s in almost all ways like Rebit from years ago.  In fact, it&#039;s exactly the same.  Keep this thing continuously connected to my PC is going to be a pain.  Great another install process and another system tray icon.  Just what I need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In a lot of ways, the Seagate Replica is like a PC version of Apple’s Time Machine.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not only is it in a  lot of ways like Time Machine, it&#8217;s in almost all ways like Rebit from years ago.  In fact, it&#8217;s exactly the same.  Keep this thing continuously connected to my PC is going to be a pain.  Great another install process and another system tray icon.  Just what I need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seagate Replica Review - Storage Informer</title>
		<link>http://www.chipchick.com/2009/04/seagate_replica_review.html/comment-page-1#comment-373890</link>
		<dc:creator>Seagate Replica Review - Storage Informer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipchick.com/?p=8229#comment-373890</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the full article [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the full article [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
