“Frankly, I would be perfectly fine with just the appetizers for everyone– us included,” he also noted.
Still, when the man brought this up to his fiancé, she was not willing to reconsider. She explained how if their guests ate roast chicken, they would have to shell out thirty dollars per plate.
And, rather than serving just appetizers altogether, the fiancé believes she is entitled to more than everyone else on her big day.
“With every decision we make, she justifies them by saying, ‘It’s OUR wedding! It’s ours, not anybody else’s!” the man explained.
Now, he is stuck between a rock and a hard place. The man does not want to start a huge fuss with his fiancé.
But, he also does not want to be a jerk to his guests.
If you were in the man’s shoes, how would you handle this sticky situation? And if you attended a wedding where they only served guests outside the bridal party appetizers, would you be pissed off?
You can read the original Reddit post here.
If true crime defines your free time, this is for you: join Chip Chick’s True Crime Tribe.
She Banned Her Nephew From Her Wedding After He Cut Up Her Wedding Dress
This 7-Year-Old California Boy Rescued A Toddler From The Bottom Of His Apartment Complex’s Pool