Her mother did not care, though, and just told her to “mind her business.” And honestly, she admits to understanding her mom’s point.
“This isn’t my business,” she revealed, “And [my mom] also said the baby is what brings her joy, and she feels a ‘special connection’ with her that she guarantees my sister doesn’t have.”
Still, she warned her mom one last time– reiterating that her sister was not messing around and the situation would get ugly. Then, she exited the conversation.
Ever since then, though, she has started to question if “injecting” herself into the argument was the right thing to do. After all, she knows that it really is none of her business. But, at the same time, she knows that her sister is right and deserves her baby.
“And I did witness the conversation of my mom offering to watch the child while they moved,” she added.
Nonetheless, she has still been left wondering if butting in and telling her mom to give her sister’s daughter back was wrong or not.
If her mother offered to watch her sister’s daughter, why do you think her mom is acting like her sister abandoned the child? Do you think it is a red flag how her mother tried to use the “special connection” statement as a reason to hold onto her niece? Did she have a right to stick up for her sister? How would you have handled the situation?
You can read the original post on Reddit here.
If true crime defines your free time, this is for you: join Chip Chick’s True Crime Tribe
Tired Of Eating Regular Salad? Try Making This Charred Romaine Instead