She Put Some Restrictions In Her Will For One of Her Sons, But Not The Other

Anatoliy Karlyuk - stock.adobe.com - illustrative purposes only, not the actual person
Anatoliy Karlyuk - stock.adobe.com - illustrative purposes only, not the actual person

This 57-year-old woman has a 28-year-old son named Sam and a 25-year-old son named Alex.

Her late husband, Dean, was the one who took care of all of the finances, and after he passed away last year, he left her everything.

Now that she has been recently diagnosed with cancer, she thought it would be a smart idea to get all of the finances sorted out for her sons.

Alex helped her set up an appointment with her husband’s lawyer, and she finished creating her will. She decided to give her house to Alex and Sam 50/50 but made sure to add some stipulations for Sam.

“Sam is not great at managing money and has gambled in the past. I personally don’t agree with gambling, but Sam is an adult, and it is his money,” she explained.

However, when Sam got married and started a family, she advised him to stop gambling for his wife’s and children’s sake since now his financial decisions would directly impact them, too.

There was a point where Sam’s marriage was a bit fragile for a few years because of his addiction and because he had gambled away their rent money, but they were able to stay together.

Sam is now trying to manage his gambling problem.

After she passes, she wants her house to stay within her family just as it has for the past three generations.

Anatoliy Karlyuk – stock.adobe.com – illustrative purposes only, not the actual person

Her lawyer told her about a life estate with remainder interest. This way, the house will go straight to her grandchildren after Sam, and he will only be able to live in, not sell, the home.

While Alex’s portion is willed straight to him, he still wouldn’t have the ability to sell it without Sam’s permission. Over a family dinner, she showed her sons her written will.

“Sam got very upset when I explained my will and said I don’t trust him over something that was ages ago and asked [if] I favor Alex. He is not talking to me,” she said.

Do you think these stipulations on Sam were wrong of her to place? Or do you think it was reasonable? Do you think Sam should have reacted in the way he did?

You can read the original post on Reddit here.

If true crime defines your free time, this is for you: join Chip Chick’s True Crime Tribe

The Last Time Her Sister Saw Her, She Gave Her A Ride To The School Bus Stop, And Then She Vanished

She Was An Amazing Woman Who Defied Racial And Gender Stereotypes While Working Hard To Create A More Just World

A Well-Decorated Patio Can Really Enhance Your Outdoor Experience, And Here Are A Few Ways To Turn This Space Into The Most Relaxing Spot

She Went On A Date With A Guy Who Said He Would Happily Pay For Her Dinner, But Only If She Agreed To Go Back To His Place Right After

Her Boyfriend Says He’s Never Going To Marry Her Since They Already Do All The Things Married Couples Do, And If She Had Wanted An Engagement Ring, She Should Have Thought Of Holding Something Over His Head As Leverage

She Lives In The Appalachian Region, And She’s Sharing A Spooky Story About The Time She Discovered Paranormal Activity In Her Basement

She Tried To Get Rid Of Her Ouija Board And Bent It In Half Before Throwing It In The Trash, But Then She Found It Months Later In Perfect Condition At The Bottom Of A Box Of Toys

Sign up for Chip Chick’s newsletter and get stories like this delivered to your inbox.

More About: