,

In Response to Michael Arrington’s “Too Few Women in Tech” Article

In case you missed it, TechCrunch’s Michael Arrington wrote a pretty brazen article this weekend about why there is a lack of women in the tech industry today. Michael was prompted to write this article as a reaction to WSJ’s recent article “Addressing The Lack Of Women Leading Tech Start-Ups“. In the article, Michael presents his own conclusion to the question of why there aren’t enough women involved in technology – and that is to stop blaming men, because he argues that it’s the fault of women. “The problem isn’t that Silicon Valley is keeping women down, or not doing enough to encourage female entrepreneurs. The opposite is true. No, the problem is that not enough women want to become entrepreneurs.”

Reactions to Michael’s sentiment have been as diverse as they have been passionate. There are men commenting by saying that yes, it is indeed women’s own fault because they are too meek. There have also been some feminist responses from the likes of women who themselves are indeed tech-entrepreneurs and who of-course totally disagree with Michael’s sentiment.

I won’t discount Michael’s article as a piece of nonsense, and I’m not of the camp that believes that all the blame falls on men. That said, I think it’s unfair to say that the men in the tech industries are altogether innocent. As a “women in tech” blogger I have faced plenty of discrimination over the past couple of years. The first year or two for Chip Chick was especially brutal. Back then there were virtually no women oriented tech blogs around. Gadget blogs were a guy thing and wholly male influenced. Slowly, more and more women gadget bloggers popped up, and eventually female, and especially mommy bloggers became a marketer’s commodity. But that took a while to happen. Yet, after all of this time, it’s still not uncommon for us to encounter the odd PR guy, who when hearing that Chip Chick is a tech site for women, will respond with something along the lines of “Oh, isn’t that cute.” Furthermore, after 6 years as working as a tech blogger, I still run into male “peers” who look straight past me. This is despite the fact that we have been attending the same events and meetings side by side for years.

But don’t get me wrong, I have plenty of male blogger friends who are awesome, and have never treated myself or other female members of the Chip Chick team any differently than they do the guys. So no, I’m not one of those men haters! Growing up, my own father and grandfather were the biggest supporters of women pursuing big carreers. They both vehemently advocated that women should pursue the best education possible and follow even the most difficult of career paths -if it’s what a woman wanted of-course. “There is nothing you can’t do, if you want too” is a phrase that my dad raised me with.

Granted I’m not an engineer, nor a programmer – so I definitely cant speak for all women in tech. But my educational background is rooted in technology – specifically interactive media. And even in graduate school, where my program was somewhat male dominated, myself and the other female students often experienced subtle forms of discrimination. Mostly this came from our peers, but occasionally it came from our professors too. Still, I cant speak for the engineers, computer programmers, and many other women in the tech industry, but I do have female friends who are engineers who have told me how difficult it was and is for them to fit into the “boys club”. They all had to work extra hard to prove themselves in their work and/or educational environments because they set out to work in a tech field that is dominated by men. It seems like for every 10 men that get accepted into a new tech environment, there is one woman who needs to work 10x as harder as one of those guys do in order to prove herself. No matter which way you look at it, it’s not easy for us girls. If you’re the geeky girl type who wears your geekiness on your sleeve, guys generally tend to snicker at you and your appearance. On the other hand, if you’re an attractive woman in a tech work environment, it seems like you have to work that much harder to prove that your brains match your looks.

Yes, what Michael says about the industry being more receptive towards women than ever is mostly true, and women do need to take the prerogative to be active members, and even leaders in tech. Yet, it’s still not easy for us to be accepted into this industry because it is quietly understood that women need to prove themselves more than their male counterparts in the industry.

But regardless of being fearful of how men will treat them in the industry, and the scrutiny that they will undoubtedly experience, women do need to pursue their dream careers. It’s our own responsibility to try and overcome these odds. After all, if it weren’t for our pioneering mothers, grandmothers and aunts that grew up earlier in the 20th century, then women would not feel comfortable in so many fields today where they currently are prospering in. So for those women who feel discouraged or intimidated about pursing that dream of making their own tech startup or working in the tech industry, don’t let anyone discourage you. Not only are you doing it for yourself,  but you’re also paving the way for future generations of women who will also dream about becoming an entrepreneur or leading member of the tech industry. And for those guys who turn up their noses at colleagues or classmates who happen to share the same career or classes with you, those ladies might end up being your boss down the road, or maybe even your future wife – if you’re lucky.

28 Comments

Leave a Reply
  1. This is such an even tempered well written response. Its good to see something like this, I think Arrington’s, all things considered (considering he does feel a bit personally attacked), also made good points. Ultimately women are responsible for how far they want to get in their careers, esp in tech. This applies to all fields, and types of people. I went to a school with a great engineering program, and was one of three black students (all male) to receive a BS in electrical engineering. They were fewer black males than Asian women. Still, however the odds may stacked against either of us nobody is going to hold you back from doing what you want to do. If it means you have to work harder to earn respect, so be it. You’ll come out that much better for it.
    *Aside* I get ridiculed by girls(not in engineering) all the time for being nerdy and spending my whole day in front of a computer. It happens when your in a highly technical field. To men, and women. Saying your an engineer doesn’t quite have the same impression as saying your banker. I don’t think this is an appropriate excuse for anything.

  2. This is such an even tempered well written response. Its good to see something like this, I think Arrington’s, all things considered (considering he does feel a bit personally attacked), also made good points. Ultimately women are responsible for how far they want to get in their careers, esp in tech. This applies to all fields, and types of people. I went to a school with a great engineering program, and was one of three black students (all male) to receive a BS in electrical engineering. They were fewer black males than Asian women. Still, however the odds may stacked against either of us nobody is going to hold you back from doing what you want to do. If it means you have to work harder to earn respect, so be it. You’ll come out that much better for it.
    *Aside* I get ridiculed by girls(not in engineering) all the time for being nerdy and spending my whole day in front of a computer. It happens when your in a highly technical field. To men, and women. Saying your an engineer doesn’t quite have the same impression as saying your banker. I don’t think this is an appropriate excuse for anything.

  3. If you want to know how predisposition can affect the outcome, please read this article and you will understand what we are discussing here:

    “Princeton Economist Finds that Auditioning Behind Screens Helps Women Win Orchestra Positions”

    http://www.princeton.edu/pr/news/97/q2/0425orch.html

    Quoted directly from the article:
    “The switch to blind auditions can explain between 30 percent and 55 percent of the increase in the proportion female among new hires and between 25 percent and 46 percent of the increase in the percentage female in the orchestras from 1970 to 1996,” the economists write. The study notes that the surge of women in symphony orchestras has occurred despite the fact that the number of positions is highly fixed and turnover is slow.

  4. If you want to know how predisposition can affect the outcome, please read this article and you will understand what we are discussing here:

    “Princeton Economist Finds that Auditioning Behind Screens Helps Women Win Orchestra Positions”

    http://www.princeton.edu/pr/news/97/q2/0425orch.html

    Quoted directly from the article:
    “The switch to blind auditions can explain between 30 percent and 55 percent of the increase in the proportion female among new hires and between 25 percent and 46 percent of the increase in the percentage female in the orchestras from 1970 to 1996,” the economists write. The study notes that the surge of women in symphony orchestras has occurred despite the fact that the number of positions is highly fixed and turnover is slow.

  5. James – thanks for your feedback on the article, it is appreciated! And you make a good point about girls discriminating against nerdy guys too 🙂

  6. James – thanks for your feedback on the article, it is appreciated! And you make a good point about girls discriminating against nerdy guys too 🙂

  7. So many to blame for the lack of women in IT. I’ve spoken to high school girls about the importance of getting into IT fields, and many glaze over. Interestingly enough, they glaze over and then start texting on their iPhones. Women are the biggest buyers of technology, yet we don’t have the biggest hand in creating it.
    Here are a couple of stories I’ve written on the topic. I’m still trying to figure it all out. I’d love to hear your thoughts.
    *Tech industry looking for girls gone geek: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35460968/ns/business-careers/
    *NASA weird attempt to lure girls: http://www.evetahmincioglu.com/web/blog/2010/08/31/houston-we-have-a-problem-nasa-hopes-nerdy-girls-will-be-much-obliged/
    *Women and tech jobs: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23033748/

  8. While I’m very glad you’ve refuted the idea that women are to blame for the gender imbalance in tech, I found this comment, “So no, I’m not one of those men haters!” a bit jarring. It doesn’t seem helpful to perpetuate the idea that a significant percentage of women who ask “what can we do to increase the number of women in tech?” are man-haters.

31 Pings & Trackbacks

  1. Pingback:

  2. Pingback:

  3. Pingback:

  4. Pingback:

  5. Pingback:

  6. Pingback:

  7. Pingback:

  8. Pingback:

  9. Pingback:

  10. Pingback:

  11. Pingback:

  12. Pingback:

  13. Pingback:

  14. Pingback:

  15. Pingback:

  16. Pingback:

  17. Pingback:

  18. Pingback:

  19. Pingback:

  20. Pingback:

  21. Pingback:

  22. Pingback:

  23. Pingback:

  24. Pingback:

  25. Pingback:

  26. Pingback:

  27. Pingback:Charles A. A.

  28. Pingback:

  29. Pingback:

  30. Pingback:

  31. Pingback:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *